The predictors of prognosis in endovascular treatment of basilar artery occlusion
EVT in BAO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54029/2023aeaKeywords:
basilar artery occlusion, endovascular treatment, national Institutes of Health Stroke ScaleAbstract
Background & Objective: Data about outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) are limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictors of functional outcome and to investigate the benefit of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and the impact of first-pass effect (FPE) on prognosis.
Methods: A total of 57 consecutive BAO patients who received EVT at our tertiary stroke center between January 2018 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was to evaluate excellent prognosis (mRS 0-1) and mortality (mRS 6) at day 90. The secondary outcome was to define the benefit of bridging IVT and the impact of FPE on prognosis. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission and at 24 hours, collateral scores, successful recanalization, asymptomatic ICH, embolization, malignant infarction and decompression were also evaluated.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.1 ± 14.5 years. Male-to-female ratio was 1.7. Hypertension (HT) was the most common risk factor. Bridging IVT was performed in nine patients (15.8%). The FPE rate was 56.1%. NIHSS scores at admission and at 24 hours were found to be statistically significant predictors of prognosis (P=0.023 and P<0.001, respectively). Bridging IVT, FPE, successful recanalization and collateral status did not significantly predict outcome.
Conclusion: Lower NIHSS scores at admission and at 24 hours were significantly associated with excellent prognosis. NIHSS scores at admission and at 24 hours were significantly higher in mortality group. sICH did not predict mortality.